Okay, so here’s something I wrote when I was a student. It’ll only make sense if you’re already familiar with House of Leaves, and if you have read it, I shouldn’t need to explain what I tried to do with this one.
But I will anyway. This is the original disclaimer I attached to it:
I have done some things in this assignment in an attempt to emulate House of Leaves – the word house appears in blue, some footnotes don’t exist. Furthermore the essay itself is written in a pseudo-Zampanò style; pretentiously grand and with the use of uncommon and untranslated (at least by the essay-writer) foreign phrases. It is as fervently impressed with House of Leaves as Zampanò is with The Navidson Record, and similarly dismissive of the opinions of quoted others. The ‘aside’ footnotes are a response to this style in the same way Johnny Truant responds to House of Leaves in the footnotes. There are intentional typographical errors in both. A third ‘voice’ is present in the form of ‘editors’ who make useful notes and corrections on the piece à la House of Leaves. These three are distinguished using different fonts as in the original. It is essentially part-essay, and part-creative piece.
Now, in its online form all the fancy-schmancy colouration and font abuse (not to mention the simplicity of reading the footnotes) is totally erased. So I urge you to view the PDF, which keeps all the original formatting, and gives a much clearer impression of what I was trying to do. The PDF also contains the bibliography, which is very important but too long to bother with here. So hit the jump to read the dodgy version, or download the PDF and make me happy.
